skip to main | skip to sidebar

S. Varadarajan's Archive

Background material on the India-U.S. nuclear agreement, Iran, energy security and arms control

  • Home
    Home Sweet Home
  • Pages
    Browse Pages
    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit
  • Categories
    By Category
    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit
Subscribe

Monday, April 10, 2006

US Allies Embrace BMD

US Allies Embrace BMD

by Martin Sieff
UPI Senior News Analyst

Washington (UPI) Apr 07, 2006

A senior State Department official this week spelled out how international ballistic missile defense cooperation is reviving U.S. strategic alliances around the world.

Far from isolating the United States internationally, the Bush administration's drive to develop effective BMD systems has been re-invigorating old strategic relationships with traditional allies around the world, Paula DeSutter, the assistant secretary of state for verification, compliance and implementation told a Washington seminar Tuesday that was sponsored by the National Defense University Foundation.

Japan under Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi remains the shining star of international cooperation with the United States on BMD.

Japan formally reached a decision to deploy a multi-layered defensive system in December 2003, which will involve the pu! rchase of the U.S. AEGIS BMD system and the Patriot PAC-3, as a purely defensive measure to protect the lives and property of citizens of Japan against ballistic missile attacks by rogue states, DeSutter said.

"In addition to deploying PAC-3 interceptors, the Japanese Defense Agency also plans to equip Maritime Self-Defense Forces destroyers with SM-3 interceptors," she said.

"U.S. Aegis Long-Range Surveillance & Tracking destroyers (are) already stationed in the Sea of Japan," DeSutter said.

"In addition, we are currently exploring other areas for missile defense cooperation, including cooperative development of next generation interceptors. Recently, on March 8, the United States and Japan successfully completed a cooperative flight-test of the SM-3 with a modified, Japanese-designed, advanced nose cone," she said.

Australia has also been energetically pushing ahead with major joint cooperation ! programs with the Untied States, DeSutter said.

"Three specific cooperative projects -- involving the Over-the-Horizon Radar, modeling and simulation, and fusion and tracking technologies -- are currently under discussion," she said.

"On Aug. 16, 2005, Canberra announced it had chosen the U.S. firm Gibbs and Cox as the preferred designer for their navy's air warfare destroyers worth up to $6 billion Australian Dollars. Three vessels are currently funded, with the first scheduled to be operational in 2013. Each will be equipped with AEGIS sensors and will be inter-operable with the military forces of the United States and with those of other future coalition partners."

NATO too "has committed financial resources to developing and acquiring an operational command and control, planning, and execution capability for the protection of deployed military forces," DeSutter said. "By 2010, the alliance expects to have the cap! ability to protect deployed military forces against short- and medium-range ballistic missiles."

The United States is also "currently assisting Israel in upgrading the performance of its operational Arrow system to give the system greater capability against longer-range threats of greater sophistication," she said.

Germany and Italy have joined the United States in developing the Medium Extended Air Defense System, or MEADS -- a highly mobile MD system for defending against short- to medium-range threats. "MEADS is scheduled to be fielded in 2014 and would be a replacement for (the) Patriot," DeSutter said.

Britain has agreed to a U.S. request to upgrade the early warning radar at Fylingdales, Yorkshire, in northeastern England, for missile defense purposes.

The United States is also exploring the possibility of "fielding a U.S. missile defense interceptor site in Europe," DeSutter said.

"The United States has conducted exploratory consultations with a number of NATO Allies regarding their interest in hosting the deployment of U.S. Missile Defense assets. No U.S. decision has been reached yet," she said. "We believe that the deployment of limited numbers of missile defense interceptors in Europe would make a significant contribution to the protection of the U.S. and European NATO Allies from a Middle Eastern ballistic missile threat."

"It is ... clear that our allies and friends are also jettisoning the Cold War logic that vulnerability is stabilizing," DeSutter concluded. "Because Cold War-style deterrence is not sufficient, missile defense is a reasonable insurance policy to purchase in today's international security environment."

Many, if not most, of the major democratic governments around the world clearly agree with her.


Source: United Press International
Posted by Siddharth Varadarajan at 7:04 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post » « Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Labels

  • Central Asia (1)
  • China (1)
  • Energy (1)
  • Nuclear issues (1)
  • US (2)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (7)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
  • ►  2007 (6)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ▼  2006 (72)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ▼  April (42)
      • US plans Asian power pipeline
      • U.S., India Differ on Nuke Test Moratorium Language
      • Brazil does nuclear work without fuss
      • Ex-Iranian nuclear negotiator makes call for ‘less...
      • New U.S. strategy anticipates China as a threat
      • More muscle, with eye on China
      • IAEA informed of Iran's P-2 centrifuge programmes
      • F.B.I. Is Seeking to Search Papers of Dead Reporter
      • Why so high? Oil markets riding new currents.
      • China advances its interests in Asia through SCO
      • SCO could admit new members in June - official
      • Faith-based frenzy that unites Iran with the oil s...
      • Iran: The centrifuge connection
      • The fuel behind Iran's nuclear drive
      • Lessons From the Denuclearization of Brazil and Ar...
      • U.S. Intelligence and the Indian Bomb [from U.S. a...
      • The Great Weapons Debate
      • Cornering the dragon
      • The real 'China threat'
      • US Invites Indian Officers To STRATCOM
      • Russia Watches US In Asia
      • US Allies Embrace BMD
      • China still vital for U.S.
      • Russia optimistic over further nuclear cooperation...
      • An energy-hungry India looks to its own bounty
      • Nuclear dealing with India too risky [The Journal-...
      • Pakistan open to N-freeze
      • Nuclear dynamics: Al-Ahram interviews El-Baradei
      • U.S. Is Studying Military Strike Options on Iran
      • The Iran Plans by Seymour Hersh
      • US Dollar Hegemony: Soft underbelly of empire
      • US-India friendship: Where we were and where we're...
      • U.S. Would Assure India Fuel Even If Delhi Tests N...
      • Poster women
      • The Indian Nuclear Deal: NYT Editorial
      • A Pretty Good Deal For America (William Cohen)
      • It makes sense to end India's nuclear isolation
      • Javad Zarif in NYT on Iran's position
      • The Wisdom Of Creating An 'India exception' -- Joh...
      • article from outlookindia.com
      • India and the nuke deal - Boston Hearld editorial
      • Burns - Einhorn debate on PBS
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2005 (1)
    • ►  November (1)

About Me

My photo
Siddharth Varadarajan
Former Editor, The Hindu
View my complete profile

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

Labels

  • Central Asia (1)
  • China (1)
  • Energy (1)
  • Nuclear issues (1)
  • US (2)
 
Copyright © S. Varadarajan's Archive. All rights reserved.
Blogger templates created by Templates Block | Wordpress theme by Tipografo