skip to main | skip to sidebar

S. Varadarajan's Archive

Background material on the India-U.S. nuclear agreement, Iran, energy security and arms control

  • Home
    Home Sweet Home
  • Pages
    Browse Pages
    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit
  • Categories
    By Category
    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit
Subscribe

Thursday, April 20, 2006

Ex-Iranian nuclear negotiator makes call for ‘less emotion’

Ex-Iranian nuclear negotiator makes call for 'less emotion'

Published: FT, April 20 2006 18:54 | Last updated: April 20 2006 18:54

Hassan Rowhani, Iran's former top security official, has called for "more balance  . . . more reason, and less emotion" in Tehran's approach to the nuclear crisis.

His remarks, reported yesterday by the official ISNA news agency, were unusually direct in advocating negotiations with the west and in criticising Iran's policy since the fundamentalist Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad won last June's presidential election. Such candour reflects concern among pragmatic conservatives as the UN Security Council's April 28 deadline approaches for Iran to suspend all nuclear activities.

Mr Rowhani led Tehran's nuclear negotiations with the European Union for two years before stepping down last year as secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) after Mr Ahmadi-Nejad's victory.

Mr Rowhani, still a heavyweight in Iran's ruling elite, sits on the SNSC along with Ali Larijani, who replaced him as SNSC secretary.

"Unfortunately, with the new administration, nuclear policy and tactics were changed," Mr Rowhani said. "Although these tactics had some success, we still had to pay a hefty price."

Mr Rowhani was apparently referring to Iran resuming nuclear research in January, which prompted the showdown with the Security Council. But he also attacked the general ap-proach of President Ahmadi-Nejad and new security officials, criticising those who "never want to sit with foreigners . . . because they feel if we do, we will [always] be deceived".

In reviewing the state of talks with the EU when Mr Ahmadi-Nejad became president, Mr Rowhani said negotiations had reached the point where the Europeans "accepted our activities in Isfahan and Natanz".

Mr Rowhani probably meant that the EU was ready to accept Iran converting raw uranium into feeder gas, done at Isfahan, and its nuclear pilot plant at Natanz in return for Iran agreeing long-term suspension of industrial-scale enrichment. The Europeans have always publicly denied this.

While not mentioning the US by name, Mr Rowhani reflected the pragmatists' view that direct talks with Washington might be needed to resolve Iran's international concerns, including the nuclear issue.

He attacked "those who consider getting close to foreigners to be like getting close to Satan", a term parallelling Iran's depiction of the US as the "Great Satan".

This key division within the conservative camp was shown last month when fundamentalists opposed Iran's announcement that it was ready to talk to the US over Iraq – a proposal on hold until a new Iraqi government is formed.

Mr Rowhani and Mr Larijani are the two SNSC representatives of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – which reflects Ayatollah Khamenei's desire to keep both conservative factions involved and his pivotal role in deciding how Iran should manage the looming crisis.

Find this article at:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/51b5b62c-d091-11da-b160-0000779e2340,s01=1.html
Posted by Siddharth Varadarajan at 11:27 PM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post » « Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Labels

  • Central Asia (1)
  • China (1)
  • Energy (1)
  • Nuclear issues (1)
  • US (2)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (7)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
  • ►  2007 (6)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ▼  2006 (72)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ▼  April (42)
      • US plans Asian power pipeline
      • U.S., India Differ on Nuke Test Moratorium Language
      • Brazil does nuclear work without fuss
      • Ex-Iranian nuclear negotiator makes call for ‘less...
      • New U.S. strategy anticipates China as a threat
      • More muscle, with eye on China
      • IAEA informed of Iran's P-2 centrifuge programmes
      • F.B.I. Is Seeking to Search Papers of Dead Reporter
      • Why so high? Oil markets riding new currents.
      • China advances its interests in Asia through SCO
      • SCO could admit new members in June - official
      • Faith-based frenzy that unites Iran with the oil s...
      • Iran: The centrifuge connection
      • The fuel behind Iran's nuclear drive
      • Lessons From the Denuclearization of Brazil and Ar...
      • U.S. Intelligence and the Indian Bomb [from U.S. a...
      • The Great Weapons Debate
      • Cornering the dragon
      • The real 'China threat'
      • US Invites Indian Officers To STRATCOM
      • Russia Watches US In Asia
      • US Allies Embrace BMD
      • China still vital for U.S.
      • Russia optimistic over further nuclear cooperation...
      • An energy-hungry India looks to its own bounty
      • Nuclear dealing with India too risky [The Journal-...
      • Pakistan open to N-freeze
      • Nuclear dynamics: Al-Ahram interviews El-Baradei
      • U.S. Is Studying Military Strike Options on Iran
      • The Iran Plans by Seymour Hersh
      • US Dollar Hegemony: Soft underbelly of empire
      • US-India friendship: Where we were and where we're...
      • U.S. Would Assure India Fuel Even If Delhi Tests N...
      • Poster women
      • The Indian Nuclear Deal: NYT Editorial
      • A Pretty Good Deal For America (William Cohen)
      • It makes sense to end India's nuclear isolation
      • Javad Zarif in NYT on Iran's position
      • The Wisdom Of Creating An 'India exception' -- Joh...
      • article from outlookindia.com
      • India and the nuke deal - Boston Hearld editorial
      • Burns - Einhorn debate on PBS
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2005 (1)
    • ►  November (1)

About Me

My photo
Siddharth Varadarajan
Former Editor, The Hindu
View my complete profile

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

Labels

  • Central Asia (1)
  • China (1)
  • Energy (1)
  • Nuclear issues (1)
  • US (2)
 
Copyright © S. Varadarajan's Archive. All rights reserved.
Blogger templates created by Templates Block | Wordpress theme by Tipografo