skip to main | skip to sidebar

S. Varadarajan's Archive

Background material on the India-U.S. nuclear agreement, Iran, energy security and arms control

  • Home
    Home Sweet Home
  • Pages
    Browse Pages
    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit
  • Categories
    By Category
    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit
Subscribe

Monday, May 15, 2006

Kremlin Voices Concern at U.S. Conventional Missile Plans

Kremlin Voices Concern at U.S. Conventional Missile Plans

By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, MOSCOW

05/11/06

The Kremlin voiced worry May 11 at reported U.S. plans to mount
non-nuclear warheads on intercontinental strategic missiles to strike
targets anywhere in the world within minutes with no prior warning and
called for talks on subject.
"I think this would be an irresponsible decision," said Sergei
Sobyanin, the newly-appointed head of President Vladimir Putin's
Kremlin administration, in a briefing to a group of foreign reporters.
The use of such a weapon could produce confusion and an unpredictable
response from other countries, Sobyanin said.
"This is an extremely dangerous trend," he said, adding: "There needs
to be a dialogue about this."
Although he did not directly name the United States, Putin on May 10
also raised Russia's concern over plans to put conventional warheads
on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), weapons long at the
center of the former U.S.-Soviet Cold War arms race and key
disarmament treaties.
"The launch of one such missile may trigger an inadequate response
from the nuclear powers, including a full-scale retaliatory strike
with the use of strategic nuclear forces," Putin said in his annual
state of the nation address.
A U.S. Defense Department report posted on the Internet states that
plans to incorporate conventional weapons capabilities into U.S.
strategic nuclear forces have been under investigation since Congress
called for a post-Cold War review of the country's nuclear deterrent
forces in 2001.
Western arms experts have cautioned, however, that Russia in
particular would have to be provided with some way of distinguishing a
conventionally-armed ICBM from a nuclear-tipped ICBM to ensure that
any use of such a weapon was not a nuclear strike.
U.S. experts say that conventional ICBMs would give the option of
striking a target anywhere on Earth within about 30 minutes and with a
large element of surprise, since there is no reliance on easily
detectable ships or aircraft.

--
Siddharth Varadarajan
Deputy Editor
The Hindu
I.N.S. Building, Rafi Marg
New Delhi - 1

Telephone: +91-11-2371-5426
Fax: +91-11-2371-8158
Mobile: +91-98111-60260

The Hindu: http://www.thehindu.com
My personal website: http://svaradarajan.blogspot.com

Posted by Siddharth Varadarajan at 7:07 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post » « Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Labels

  • Central Asia (1)
  • China (1)
  • Energy (1)
  • Nuclear issues (1)
  • US (2)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (7)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
  • ►  2007 (6)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ▼  2006 (72)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ▼  May (17)
      • Dragon-elephant ties no zero-sum game
      • Iran could be west’s trial run — Mbeki
      • Kremlin Voices Concern at U.S. Conventional Missil...
      • Pentagon Defends Global-Strike Plan -- Conventiona...
      • Iran's oil exchange to trade oil for euros, not do...
      • Iran's oil stock exchange, next week
      • Euro oil bourse: Iran signs its own death warrant
      • Experts: Iran oil proposal long shot
      • US, Russia spat before July G-8 summit
      • The Pipes Carry Clout With the Oil
      • Democrat proposes India nuclear deal compromise
      • Raid on Nuclear Fuel Market
      • Indian nuclear pact raises doubts in Congress
      • Australia, China Conclude Nuclear Deal
      • ACT: Congress Ponders Conditions for U.S.-Indian Deal
      • UN Security Council draft resolution on Iran
      • USAF Interest in Lasers Triggers Concerns About An...
    • ►  April (42)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2005 (1)
    • ►  November (1)

About Me

My photo
Siddharth Varadarajan
Former Editor, The Hindu
View my complete profile

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

Labels

  • Central Asia (1)
  • China (1)
  • Energy (1)
  • Nuclear issues (1)
  • US (2)
 
Copyright © S. Varadarajan's Archive. All rights reserved.
Blogger templates created by Templates Block | Wordpress theme by Tipografo